What Happens at an Immigration Bond Hearing in California?

immigration bond hearing California

If ICE has taken someone you know into custody, a bond hearing may be the fastest way to get them released. But immigration bond hearings do not work the way most people expect. The rules are different from criminal court, the burden of proof falls on the wrong person, and the entire process has been thrown into chaos by policy changes in 2025 and 2026.

Here is what actually happens at an immigration bond hearing in California, what to expect, and how to prepare.

What Is an Immigration Bond Hearing?

An immigration bond hearing is a proceeding before an immigration judge where a person in ICE custody asks to be released on bond while their immigration case is pending. The judge decides two things:

  • Is the person a danger to the community?
  • Is the person a flight risk (likely to miss future court hearings)?

If the judge finds the person is neither, bond is set at an amount the judge considers appropriate. The minimum is $1,500 under the law. In practice, bond amounts in California in 2026 range from $5,000 to $20,000 for people without serious criminal histories. Amounts above $25,000 are not uncommon for people with criminal records or prior immigration violations.

Who Is Eligible for a Bond Hearing?

This is where things have gotten complicated. Before 2025, most people in removal proceedings under INA Section 236(a) were eligible for a bond hearing. That changed dramatically.

People who are generally eligible:

  • Individuals arrested by ICE who were previously admitted or paroled into the United States
  • People with no criminal convictions that trigger mandatory custody
  • Class members under the Maldonado Bautista ruling (within the Central District of California)

People who may be ineligible:

  • Individuals with aggravated felony convictions or certain other criminal grounds under INA Section 236(c)
  • People in expedited removal proceedings
  • Arriving noncitizens (those apprehended at a port of entry)
  • People who entered without inspection, depending on jurisdiction (see below)

The Fight Over Bond Eligibility for People Who Entered Without Inspection

In September 2025, the BIA issued Matter of Yajure Hurtado, holding that immigration judges have no authority to conduct bond hearings for people who entered the United States without inspection. This eliminated bond eligibility for a massive number of people overnight.

In November 2025, a federal court in the Maldonado Bautista case overruled this decision, finding that class members are held under INA Section 236(a) and are entitled to bond hearings. In February 2026, the court issued a further order vacating Matter of Yajure Hurtado after the government continued to deny bond hearings in defiance of the earlier ruling.

However, the government appealed, and as of March 2026, the Ninth Circuit granted a partial administrative stay. The Maldonado Bautista protections currently remain in effect only within the Central District of California (covering Riverside, Santa Ana, and Orange counties, including the Adelanto facility). Outside that district, the legal landscape is uncertain and varies by jurisdiction.

If your family member entered without inspection and is held outside the Central District of California, a habeas corpus petition in federal court may be the best path to a bond hearing.

What Happens During the Hearing

Bond hearings are typically short, often lasting 15 to 30 minutes. Here is the general sequence:

  • The judge confirms identity and charges. The judge verifies who the person is and reviews the basis for their custody.
  • ICE presents its position. The government attorney argues whether the person should be held, often citing criminal history, immigration violations, or flight risk factors.
  • Your attorney presents evidence. This is where preparation matters most. Your attorney will present evidence of community ties, family relationships, employment, and the strength of the underlying immigration case.
  • The judge makes a decision. The judge either grants bond (setting a specific dollar amount), denies bond, or in rare cases reserves the decision for a later date.

The hearing can take place in person or by video from the facility where the person is held. Video hearings are increasingly common in California.

Evidence That Makes the Difference

The strongest bond hearing presentations include:

  • Family ties: Birth certificates of U.S. citizen children, marriage certificates, letters from family members, school records showing children’s enrollment
  • Employment: Pay stubs, tax returns, W-2s, employer verification letters
  • Community roots: Lease agreements, utility bills, church membership records, letters from community leaders
  • Compliance history: Evidence of attending prior hearings, checking in with ICE as required, prior visa compliance
  • Strength of immigration case: A pending asylum application, approval notices, or attorney declarations outlining the merits of the underlying case
  • Sponsor information: A letter from the person who will house and support the individual upon release, including their legal status, address, and relationship

How to Request a Bond Hearing

A bond hearing can be requested orally or in writing. Your attorney files a motion with the immigration court where the case is assigned. There is no filing fee for an initial bond hearing request.

If bond is denied and circumstances change, you can request a new bond hearing by filing a motion for bond redetermination. Changed circumstances can include new family ties, a stronger immigration case, significant time in custody, or changed conditions in the person’s home country.

What to Do if Bond Is Denied

If the immigration judge denies bond:

  • File a habeas corpus petition in federal district court challenging the denial, particularly if you believe the judge applied an incorrect legal standard
  • Request a new bond hearing when circumstances materially change
  • Request parole from ICE for humanitarian reasons (medical emergency, sole caretaker of children, pregnancy)
  • Appeal the denial to the BIA, though this is typically slower than a habeas petition

The Bond Hearing System Is Under Enormous Strain

Immigration courts nationwide are overwhelmed. As of 2026, the backlog exceeds 3.7 million cases. Bond hearings are supposed to happen quickly, but delays of weeks are common. Meanwhile, people sit in custody, separated from their families, unable to work, and struggling to prepare their cases.

The system is not fair. The burden of proof falls on the person locked up, not the government that locked them up. Bond amounts are set without standardized guidelines, producing wildly different outcomes in different courts. And the government has spent the past year trying to eliminate bond hearings altogether for a large portion of the people it has taken into custody.

If someone you know is facing a bond hearing in California, call us immediately. Represented individuals are far more likely to be released on bond, and the evidence presented at the hearing can determine whether someone spends weeks, months, or years in custody.

Author Bio

Lina Baroudi is the owner and managing attorney at the Law Office of Lina Baroudi. Lina is a dedicated immigration attorney with over ten years of experience in the field. As an immigrant herself, having moved to the United States from Syria at a young age, Ms. Baroudi understands the challenges and complexities that immigrants face. Her personal connection to immigrant rights fuels her passion and commitment to achieving success for her clients.

Throughout her career, Lina has been recognized for her excellence in immigration law. She was listed in the California 2015-2020 Rising Stars List by Super Lawyers, an honor given to only 2.5 percent of attorneys in the state. Lina’s proficiency in the field is further evidenced by her role as a Law Clerk at the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District, where she gained invaluable experience and knowledge. She also received the prestigious Witkin Award for Academic Excellence in Immigration Law during her time at Golden Gate University School of Law.

LinkedIn | State Bar Association | Avvo | Google